Riendeau v. . Bullock
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme -Court in the third judicial department, made November 22, 1892, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee and directed a new trial. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The contract passed title to ■all the ice to defendants. (1 Greenl. on Ev. 277; 13 N. Y. .566; Banger v. Waterbury, 25 Wkly.
Read the full summary
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme -Court in the third judicial department, made November 22, 1892, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee and directed a new trial. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The contract passed title to ■all the ice to defendants. (1 Greenl. on Ev. 277; 13 N. Y. .566; Banger v. Waterbury, 25 Wkly. Dig. 224; 19 N. Y. 330; 51 N. Y. 437; 25 N. Y. 320; 42 N. Y. 118; 71 N. Y. 291; 116 N. Y. 371; 44 N. Y. 499; Stephens v. Santee, 49 N. Y. 35; Van Hoozer v.…
1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the sale and delivery of a quantity of ice.
On the 31st day of May, 1890, the plaintiff entered into a contract in ■writing with the defendants in and by which he agreed to sell, and they agreed to take, all the ice in his storehouses on Chambly canal, to be delivered F. O. B. on canal boats at such storehouses, at §2.75 per ton for all delivered during the month of June, 1890, and §3 per ton for all delivered during the month of July, 1890, the weight to be determined by the weighlock weight at Waterfo.rd. It was also…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gray v. Central Railroad Co. of New JerseyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Harrow Co. v. E. Bement & SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Arkansas & Texas Grain Co. v. Young & Fresch Grain Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Lagerloef Trading Co. v. American Paper Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923