State v. McComas

Defendant has appealed from a judgment of conviction of the crime of grand larceny and from an order denying her motion for a new trial.

The sufficiency of the information is not challenged. It charges the larceny, on September 11, 1929, of a saddle of the value of $80, belonging to R. S. Harper. The principal assignment of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence in corroboration of that of an accomplice to meet the requirements of section 11988, Revised Codes 1921.

The accomplice, E. H. Arthur, testified that on September 11 he saw defendant and Kenneth Bramblett in the Cort Hotel in…