Legal Opinion

State v. Yegen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1929No. 6,550PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ford

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment of conviction on the charge of grand larceny and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

By information the defendant was charged with having stolen a Belgian stallion branded on the left thigh, the property of Frye & Co., a corporation. The state’s case rested largely upon the testimony of William Steele, an admitted accomplice, who testified in substance that on or about 6 o’clock of September 6, 1927, after attending a dance at de fendant’s ranch the night before, defendant directed him, Jimmie Du Bray, and Dewey Cobell to go to what…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RitzMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. CobbMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. MatkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. SlothowerMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. HarkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MoranMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. PhillipsMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. HarmonMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. AkersMontana Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API