Strauss v. Gorman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Michael Strauss, an account executive for Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., appeals an order which denied his motion to compel arbitration and his motion to dismiss Gorman’s three-count complaint.
In the motion to compel arbitration, Strauss conceded that count I of the complaint which alleges violations of the Florida Securities Act, chapter 517, Florida Statutes (1983), was not arbitrable on authority of Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 456 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1984). Oppenheimer was subsequently vacated by the United States Supreme Court at — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1830, 85 L.Ed.2d 131 (1985)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Page v. EzellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Department of Prof. Reg. v. RentfastDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Cole v. PosadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- MASSIMO MARINONI AND EUDES MARINONI v. FITESA NAOTECIDOS S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022