Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Gorman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 11, 1985No. 85-238PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Strauss, an account executive for Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., appeals an order which denied his motion to compel arbitration and his motion to dismiss Gorman’s three-count complaint.

In the motion to compel arbitration, Strauss conceded that count I of the complaint which alleges violations of the Florida Securities Act, chapter 517, Florida Statutes (1983), was not arbitrable on authority of Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 456 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1984). Oppenheimer was subsequently vacated by the United States Supreme Court at — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1830, 85 L.Ed.2d 131 (1985)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Page v. EzellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Department of Prof. Reg. v. RentfastDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Cole v. PosadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. MASSIMO MARINONI AND EUDES MARINONI v. FITESA NAOTECIDOS S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API