Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends on appeal that the court erred in conducting his trial in absentia. We disagree. On May 5, 1988, the court informed defendant that "the trial now has been set for Monday, May 16th. It will probably be eleven o’clock because of the other commitments that morning. So eleven o’clock the trial will commence. You have to be there. Of course, the trial could be held without you, you understand that?” Defendant acknowledged that he understood the court’s admonition. On May 16, 1988, the case was called for trial, but defendant did not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. MehmediNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. EppsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. VatajNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ABUJUDEH, AIMAN H., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. AbujudehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. AbujudehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API