Legal Opinion

Blair v. Blair

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 13, 1990No. 89-071PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This appeal involves a dispute over whether an award to defendant of $25,000 as a property distribution, plus $5,000 for attorney’s fees, is an abuse of discretion. Defendant-wife claims that the total amount of money awarded to her represents only 20% of the marital assets, a decidedly unjust result given the evidence of battering she endured over the course of this four year marriage.

We need not reach the issue of abuse of discretion, because the oral findings of fact issued extemporaneously at the conclusion of the trial are sufficiently ambiguous and incomplete to warrant another hearing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. CiskieWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. AnayaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. People v. TorresNew York Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Soutiere v. SoutiereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. Soutiere v. SoutiereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API