Legal Opinion
In Re Cement and Concrete Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided February 28, 1979No. 296PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
465 F.Supp. 1299 (1979)
In re CEMENT AND CONCRETE ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
State of Missouri v. Portland Cement Association, et al., W. D. Missouri, C. A. No. 78-4192-CV-C
State of Utah v. Portland Cement Association, et al., D. Utah, C. A. No. C78-0429
State of Nebraska v. Portland Cement Association, et al., D. Nebraska, C. A. No. CV78-L-242
State of New Mexico v. Portland Cement Association, et al., D. New Mexico, C. A. No. CIV-78-808-C
State of Montana v. Portland Cement Association, et al., D. Montana, C. A. No. CV-78-72BU
No. 296.
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
February 28, 1979.
Before…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Cement and Concrete Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Hawaiian Hotel Room Rate Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
- In Re Airport Car Rental Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In re Sinking of the Motor Vessel UkolaUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Named v. Penn-Dixie Industries, Inc. (In Re Penn-Dixie Industries, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- In Re Motion Picture Licensing Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1979
- In Re Cuisinart Food Processor Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1981