A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Co. v. Burlington & Missouri River Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tlie district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ambrosio, J. See opinions for references to authorities.
1DissentNorval, J.
I do not concur in the judgment just rendered. There is no controversy as to the material facts. Simpson, Perkins & Co. were wbolesale dealers in lumber at Dallas, Texas, from whom C. N. Deitz, without plaintiff’s knowledge, before January 8, 1892, ordered 20 cars of lum-. *344ber to be delivered to himself at Omaha. Simpson, Perkins & Oo. thereupon'sent a letter, inclosing order for the 20 cars of lumber, to the plaintiff, the A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Company, at'Waldo, Arkansas. The letter is as follows:
“Dallas, Texas, Jan. 8, 1892.
“A. J. Neimeyer Lumber Company, Waldo, Arle. — Gentlemen: We…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The Bank of Rochester v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Suit v. WoodhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Michigan Central Railroad v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Sheffield Furnace Co. v. Hull Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Capehart v. Furman Farm Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.