Ruth v. Lousiana Pacific Paper Pulp Company/Mill
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EBER G. RUTH, Case No. 24-cv-06673-TLT 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 9 10 LOUSIANA PACIFIC PAPER PULP COMPANY/MILL, 11 Defendant. 12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed this action. His complaint is now before the 15 Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915A. The complaint will be dismissed for 16 failure to state a claim. 17 Plaintiff’s application to proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP) will be granted by separate 18 order. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. Standard of Review 21 A federal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.