Legal Opinion

Mix v. Cowles

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 15, 1850PublishedCited by 7 opinions

IN ERROR. This was a bill in chancery, to redeem mortgaged premises. On a hearing before the superior court, October term, 1849, the following facts were found. On the 2d of September. 1846, George W. Brown and Samuel N. Beecher mortgaged a parcel of land in Meriden, to Rosetta M. Cowles, one of the defendants, to secure the payment of four promissory notes. Beecher, afterwards, released all his interest in the premises to Brown.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR. This was a bill in chancery, to redeem mortgaged premises. On a hearing before the superior court, October term, 1849, the following facts were found. On the 2d of September. 1846, George W. Brown and Samuel N. Beecher mortgaged a parcel of land in Meriden, to Rosetta M. Cowles, one of the defendants, to secure the payment of four promissory notes. Beecher, afterwards, released all his interest in the premises to Brown. On the 17th of January, 1848, Brown executed a mortgage deed of the premises to James T. Mix Co., the plaintiffs, to secure the payment of a promissory note, of the…

1Opinion of the Court

Cijürch, Ch. J.

On the 2d day of September, 1846, Brown and Beecher mortgaged the land in question to Rosetta M. Cowles, to secure the payment of several notes. On the 17th day of January, 1848, Brown, who then owned the entire equity of redemption, executed to the plaintiffs a mortgage deed of the same land, conditioned to pay a note of two hundred dollars, dated the same day, and made payable to the plaintiffs, or order, at the Meriden Bank, four months after date. If this last was a valid mortgage, the plaintiffs, as second mortgagees, have a right to redeem the first mortgage.

As to the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beach v. OsborneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  2. Matz v. ArickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Lampson Lumber Co. v. ChiarelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Rood v. WelchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  5. Summers v. A. Roos & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API