Legal Opinion

Timms v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 10, 1981No. 89-80PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts in this case are stipulated. The plaintiffs complain, and the State acknowledges, that the necessary use of salt from time to time to de-ice Route 114 in Island Pond has rendered the plaintiffs’ adjoining well unfit for use. Both sides agree that the application of the salt was not negligent. The damages are stipulated at $2,500.

The State claims justification based on the police power. However, “the police power is not limitless, even though it be but another name for sovereignty itself.” Vermont Woolen Corp. v. Wackerman, 122 Vt. 219, 224, 167 A.2d 538, 537 (1961). The police power…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foss v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Sanborn v. Village of Enosburg FallsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Vermont Woolen Corporation v. WackermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  4. Griswold v. Town School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  5. State v. QuattropaniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ondovchik Family Ltd. Partnership v. Agency of TransportationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. Southview Associates, Ltd. v. BongartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley and Joanne Crowley, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  4. Conway v. SorrellDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1995
  5. Southview Associates, Ltd. v. BongartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API