Legal Opinion
State v. Quattropani
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
Assuming to act under the authority conferred by Chapter 271 of the General Laws, the State Board of Health made and promulgated an order prohibiting boating on Berlin Pond, which is the source of the water supply of the city of Montpelier. The respondent violated this order, and was prosecuted therefor in the city court of Barre, wherein he was convicted and fined. He brings the case here on a bill of excep tions which presents several questions, the most important of which challenges the validity of the order' on constitutional grounds.
The respondent treats the order as having been made…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- State v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. Ludlow Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Choquette v. PerraultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Vermont Woolen Corporation v. WackermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn and Natural Resources BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Beecham v. LeahySupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.