Legal Opinion

Silberman v. Angert

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 18, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a bill for an accounting of profits derived from the sale of real estate under a verbal agreement.

The elements necessary to create a general partnership are lacking. There was no partnership name, no stationery of the alleged partnership, no joint office and no joint bank account.

It appears, however, that the parties did in a few instances enter into and complete joint ventures. This, however, does not in itself establish a partnership. The act concerning partnerships (chapter 212, laws of 1919, part 2, section 7, articles 2 and 3, at page 483), says:

"Joint tenancy, tenancy in common,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schultz v. WaldonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1901
  2. Partridge v. CummingsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  3. Grant v. Steenland Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nat'l Prem. Budget Plan Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Presten v. SailerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. DeMarco v. EstlowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Mianulli v. GunaganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Nat. Prem. Corp. v. Nat. Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API