Legal Opinion

Fudge v. Fudge

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error- from Allen District Court. Ejectment brought by Nancy Fudge and nine others against Conrad Fudge and another, to recover certain i*eal estate which • defendants held under an administrator’s deed. Trial at the. February Term, 1879, of the district court, and judgment for • defendants. The plaintiffs bring the case to this court.. The .facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action of ejectment, brought by the heirs of Adam Fudge against one holding under an administrator’s deed. The first question presented is, as to the power of the court to order the sale of the land because of its homestead character. It appears that on the purchase of the land, Adam Fudge and wife executed a note and mortgage for part of the purchase-money. He moved upon the place, and occupied it as a homestead until his death, and his widow and children continued to so occupy it until dispossessed under the administrator’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mickel v. HicksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Dayton v. DonartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Howe v. McGivernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Johnson v. CainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Mo. River, Fort Scott & Gulf Rld. v. ShepardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pioneer Mortgage Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Powers v. ScharlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Pritchard v. MadrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. Crapster v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API