Union Carbide Corp. v. Synatzske
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Lehrmann
I join Justioe Boyd in concluding that Chapter 90’s safety valve provision does not require a plaintiff to produce a pulmonary function test showing impairment. However, because the Court arrives at the opposite holding, I write separately to consider whether the application of Chapter 90 as construed and applied here violates the Texas Constitution’s prohibition on retroactive laws. Tex. Const, art. I, § 16.
“A retroactive statute is one which gives to preenactment conduct a different legal effect from that which it would have had without the passage of the statute.” Charles B. Hochman, The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.