Legal Opinion

Pioneer Engineering Co. v. Cardillo

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1946No. 6041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., the plaintiffs, Pioneer Engineering Company and New Amsterdam Casualty Company, incidental to their action for judicial review of a compensation order and award entered by Deputy Commissioner Frank A. Cardillo, on May 17, 1946, filed their present motion for an interlocutory injunction to stay payment under said order and award.

Sec. 21(b) provides inter alia: “The payment of the amounts required by an award shall not be stayed pending final decision in any such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Tucker v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johns v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Higgins, Inc. v. DonovanDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966
  3. Seas Shipping Co. v. CardilloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949
  4. Holland America Insurance v. RogersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API