Legal Opinion

COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Bethlehem Steel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1979No. 51PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This appeal is dismissed. Permission to appeal was granted to consider the continued validity of the rule that the statute of limitations does not run against the Commonwealth in light of Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384, 388 A.2d 709 (1978). But that issue should not be decided in this case because the Commonwealth Court’s refusal to allow an amendment to the answer in order to raise the statute of limitations in new matter does not constitute an abuse of discretion even if we were to hold the statute of limitations applies to the Commonwealth.

The…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tanner v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Borough of Mifflinburg v. HeimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Carpitella v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. J. W. Bishop & Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Kenney v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API