Legal Opinion

Smart v. Valencia

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1927No. 2771PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $1,100 which he alleged was paid to the defendants through a mutual mistake, judgment was for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed.

The parties will be referred to as in the trial court.

The defendants were the owners of a band of sheep in Jack’s Valley, White Pine County. They contracted to sell and deliver these sheep in the band under the age of two years to the Henderson-Griswold Company, and the balance to the plaintiff at the price of $11 per head— the sheep to be delivered to both purchasers on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Eagle Bank of New-Haven v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
  3. Simms v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Devine v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Thresher v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kondas v. Washoe County BankNevada Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API