Legal Opinion
State v. Handy
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 23, 2012No. 2010-399Published
1Opinion of the Court
44 A.3d 776 (2012)
2012 VT 21
STATE of Vermont
v.
Jay S. HANDY, Sr.
No. 10-399.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
March 23, 2012.
William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, and Ultan Doyle and David Tartter, Assistant Attorneys General, Montpelier, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Joshua S. O'Hara of Maguire Law Associates, PLC, Essex Junction, for Defendant-Appellant.
Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ.
JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1. Following defendant's conviction for a sex offense, the superior court, criminal division, granted the State's motion to compel defendant to submit to testing for sexually…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cavanaugh v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- In Re Juveniles A, B, C, D, EWashington Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.