Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel, Leon A.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 6, 2002No. 01-3032 & 01-3033PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.

GARLAND, Circuit Judge:

The sentence imposed by the district court in this case included an upward adjustment because the defendant, Leon Samuel, committed an offense while on release for another crime. Samuel contends that this sentencing enhancement violated the rule, announced by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, that “any fact thht increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 2362-63, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GordonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. AgramonteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. United States v. ConfredoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. DisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Graham, Steven A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API