Legal Opinion

Rapid Machine Works, Inc. v. Silberstein

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 12, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

Action for conversion of two printing presses. Plaintiff proved right to possession, demand and refusal, and the market value of the presses. In cross-examination it developed that the presses were returned to plaintiff by defendant under a stipulation that the return was to be “ without prejudice ” to plaintiff's cause of action for conversion. The presses had the same value when returned as when converted. Plaintiff is a dealer in second-hand presses, and did not use them for any other purpose than buying and selling. Upon these facts a verdict was directed for plaintiff for nominal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Suzuki v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Mercantile Factors Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Johnson v. MarksAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American East India Corp. v. Ideal Shoe Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Coan v. Plaza Equity Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API