Whelchel v. Stennett
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
L. L. Little, through his attorneys, E. W. Stennett and Ross R. Barnett, appellees in this case, recovered a judgment in the sum of $13,825, against the Sumner Stores, for alleged slander of him by the manager of the store in Jackson. The judgment was paid in full. The appellant, Whelchel, brought this action in the Circuit Court of Hinds county against the attorneys in that case, Stennett and Barnett, to recover 20'% of the amount of that judgment. The declaration charges that Little employed Stennett and Barnett as his attorneys, agreeing to pay them a contingent fee of 60% of the amount…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Holland v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Grapico Bottling Co. v. EnnisMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
- Lyon v. HusseyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Whittington v. H. T. Cottam Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Holmes v. T. M. Strider & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hill v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. Biloxi Municipal School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1963
- Board of Educ. of Lamar County v. HudsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Rast v. SorrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Independent Linen Service Co. v. SennettMississippi Supreme Court · 1943