Legal Opinion

Wescott v. Bridwell

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1867PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Land Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFagg, Judge

This was a proceeding instituted in the Land Court for St. Louis county in accordance with the provisions of an act entitled “An act for the better security of mechanics and others erecting buildings, or furnishing materials for the same, in the county of St. Louis.”

No declarations of law were asked, and no objections made at the trial to the introduction of testimony.

We think there was no sufficient reason for the granting of a new trial, and the only question that need be discussed at all is the alleged irregularity o£ the judgment.

Wescott, the plaintiff below, claimed to be a subcontractor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wibbing v. PowersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  2. Ashburn v. AyresSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McClanahan v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Ozark County v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Russell v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Steinmann v. StrimpleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Hunt v. Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API