Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Missouri Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Rat, J.This

cause was before the St. Louis Court of Appeals, and is reported in 14 Mo. App. 160.

The point most pressed at the oral argument before-us, and in the brief of counsel for the railroad company, and the one we think of most importance, as to it, is. whether there is sufficient evidence of negligence on its-part to go to the jury. A similar objection was also raised and urged by counsel for defendant, Higgins, as to him. We have carefully considered the evidence, and especially with reference to this objection. The majority of the court are of opinion that as to the defendant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mueller v. KaessmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Miller v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Hunt v. Missouri RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Wescott v. BridwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  5. Shaw v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McClanahan v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Sparks v. Dispatch Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. State ex rel. Ozark County v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Blackmer & Post Pipe Co. v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Mechanics' Bank ex rel. Davis v. GilpinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API