Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Tye
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 19, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Sims, Commissioner
Reversing.
On May 26, 1926, the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as the Company, is sued a policy for $1,000 on the life of Arthur Tye, in which his wife, Nora, was named as beneficiary. The semi-annual premiums of $16.46 were payable on May-26th and Nov. 26th. At the time the policy was issued, Tye and his wife were living together and resided in Chicago. About one year thereafter they separated but were never divorced, and she subsequently returned to her home in Barbourville, Ky., where she was residing at the time of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Quist v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Colovos' Adm'r v. GouvasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Hoskins v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Twyman v. TwymanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Wentworth v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Codell v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- National Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. TyeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943