Meriano v. Sessions, III
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION JULIE MERIANO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:18-cv-00401-SRB ) WILLIAM BARR,1 ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant William Barr’s (“FBI”)2 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #42). For the following reasons the motion is GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) requires a court to grant a motion for summary judgment if 1) the moving party “shows that there is no genuine dispute of material fact” and 2) the moving party…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.