Legal Opinion

Meriano v. Sessions, III

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided December 17, 2019No. 4:18-cv-00401Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION JULIE MERIANO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:18-cv-00401-SRB ) WILLIAM BARR,1 ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE ) UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant William Barr’s (“FBI”)2 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #42). For the following reasons the motion is GRANTED. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) requires a court to grant a motion for summary judgment if 1) the moving party “shows that there is no genuine dispute of material fact” and 2) the moving party…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API