Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Porter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 2013No. 102,662PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

Adam Simmons was seriously injured in a gasoline fire while at work. Pie sued his employer for negligently failing to provide him with a reasonably safe workplace. The district court denied his claim based on the common-law assumption of risk doctrine, which can bar recovery when an employee who knows of a dangerous situation voluntarily exposes himself or herself to that danger. The Court of Appeals affirmed based on existing precedent. Simmons v. Porter, 45 Kan. App. 2d 177, 182-83, 245 P.3d 1091 (2011). Simmons argues we should abandon…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Mead v. M.S.B., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Keiswetter v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. McCullough v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Estate of Randolph v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. Schreiner v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  5. Tillman v. GoodpastureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API