State v. Chacon
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:
Defendant Ernest Chacon appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery, claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Chacon seeks a new trial because of the following omissions on the part of trial counsel: (1) failing to file a pretrial notice of intention to rely on a voluntary intoxication defense as required by Utah Code Ann. § 77-14-4 (Supp.1997); (2) failing to adequately investigate the intoxication defense, to seek appointment of a blood alcohol expert, or to call witnesses…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Codianna v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Parsons v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- State v. HumphriesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.