Legal Opinion

State v. Chacon

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1998No. 970008PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:

Defendant Ernest Chacon appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery, claiming he received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Chacon seeks a new trial because of the following omissions on the part of trial counsel: (1) failing to file a pretrial notice of intention to rely on a voluntary intoxication defense as required by Utah Code Ann. § 77-14-4 (Supp.1997); (2) failing to adequately investigate the intoxication defense, to seek appointment of a blood alcohol expert, or to call witnesses…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Codianna v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Parsons v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. State v. HumphriesUtah Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API