Legal Opinion
Lane v. Fein, Such and Crane, LLP
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 3, 2011No. 10-cv-2435(ADS)(ETB)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Martin and Maureen Lane, the plaintiffs in this case, assert that the defendant law firm Fein, Such and Crane, LLP (“Fein LLP”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”), as well as other laws, in connection with a legal action in New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County brought to foreclose on their property. The defendant now moves to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant for FecLR.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
The following…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Stutman v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Stewart v. BiermanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Carlin v. Davidson Fink LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Gabriele v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Fritz v. Resurgent Capital Services, LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.