Legal Opinion

(PC) Dynes v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Department

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 18, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00246Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN RAY DYNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00246-DAD-JDP 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 KEN CLARK, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS 15 Defendants. ECF No. 11 16 17 18 Plaintiff John Ray Dynes is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 19 action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges Eighth Amendment violations arising 20 from his medical treatment at Mule Creek State Prison. On April 7, 2020, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Toguchi v. Soon Hwang ChungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Lance Jett v. M. Penner, D. Peterson, and Cheryl K. Pliler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API