Vine v. Casmey
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Polk county to recover $600 for-the conversion of hay. The case was tried before Watts, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $230. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant Charles' Casmey appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The complaint herein, so far as here material, is in these words: *75The plaintiff, for cause of action, alleges: That on the 15th day of October, 1900, he was the owner and in the lawful possession of sixty tons of hay on section thirty-four in the town of Belgium, Polk county, Minnesota, of the value of six hundred dollars;, that on said day the defendants herein unlawfully and wrongfully 'took, carried away, and converted to their own use the said hay, whereby plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant for the sum of six hundred dollars, with interest.
The separate answer of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Groff v. RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Carli v. Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Hoffman v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cobb v. Midwest Recovery Bureau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Anderson v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Huebsch v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Johnson v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Hively v. GolnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.