Legal Opinion

In Re Archer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2006No. 05-277PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶1 In this case, we address a question certified to us pursuant to Rule 44, M.R.App.P., by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana. The question is:

May a debtor claim an exemption pursuant to § 25-13-608(1)(f), MCA, in proceeds from the sale of shares of stock in a business under an agreement to sell such stock, as exempt “benefits,” when such proceeds are used exclusively to pay for the debtor’s end-of-life medical, surgical or hospital care and medications?

For the reasons set forth below, we answer the question “no.”

BACKGROUND

¶2 The following factual background is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Western Energy Co. v. State, Dept. of Rev.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. MacDonald v. MercillMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Esterly v. Broadway Garage Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ferguson v. SpeithMontana Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. StiffarmMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Bank of America v. IveyMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Matter of GolzMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In re GiacomettoMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. CBI Inc. v. Sharon McCreaMontana Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API