Legal Opinion
Cipparulo v. David Friedland Painting Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 4, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
139 N.J. Super. 142 (1976)
353 A.2d 105
ALEX CIPPARULO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID FRIEDLAND PAINTING CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 2, 1975.
Decided February 4, 1976.
Before Judges MATTHEWS, LORA and MORGAN.
Mr. Jack Wysoker argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Mandel, Wysoker, Sherman, Glassner, Weingartner & Feingold, attorneys).
Mr. Ernest Prupis argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weltchek, Prupis & Ritz, attorneys).
2Per curiam
This is an action brought under the New Jersey Prevailing Wage Act (PWA),…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Male v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Male v. Ernest Renda Contracting Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- NEWARK LABORERS' v. Comm. Union Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Bushman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Twin Falls Construction Co. v. Operating Engineers Local 370Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
4Cited by6 opinions
- New Jersey Carpenters & the Trustees Thereof Ex Rel. Chatten v. Tishman Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Horn v. Serritella Bros., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Serraino v. Mar-D, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Bankston v. Housing AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY v. Union Paving & Constr. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.