Legal Opinion

Evanston Insurance Company v. Murphy

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04954Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Evanston Insurance Company, No. CV-19-04954-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Tracey Portee Murphy, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Summary of Discovery Dispute. (Doc. 83.) 16 Defendant/Counter-Claimant Tracey Portee Murphy (“Murphy”) seeks production of 17 claim file documents that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Evanston Insurance Company 18 (“Evanston”) has redacted or withheld on attorney-client privilege and work-product 19 grounds. The Court held a discovery dispute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  2. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. Energy Mgt. P 26,389 Conoco Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States Department of Justice. Conoco Inc. v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API