Legal Opinion
Bigman v. Dime Savings Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 25, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for tortious interference with business relations, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated May 2, 1988, as denied those branches of its motion which were to compel disclosure by three nonparty witnesses, MBK Holding Company, Inc., James Cappa, and Rooplall Premlall, and to punish pursuant to CPLR 2308 (a) one nonparty witness for failing to respond to a subpoena.
Ordered that on the court’s own motion the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wiseman v. American Motors Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Fell v. Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- State v. Carey Resources, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Witt v. Triangle Steel Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Juseinoski v. New York Hospital Medical Center of QueensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Knitwork Productions Corp. v. HelfatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Lager Associates v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Mendelson v. SzczupakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cajamarca v. OsatukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.