Straka v. Voyles
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution.
Plaintiff in his complaint, in substance, alleged that the “defendant falsely, maliciously, and without probable cause” made -oath to a complaint in which he “falsely, maliciously, and without probable cause” alleged that he believed that the plaintiff “was insane and a fit subject for care and treatment in the State Mental Hospital,” and that the defendant “falsely, maliciously, and! without probable cause” procured plaintiff’s arrest; that the plaintiff was arrested and confined in the Salt Lake county j ail for the space of three days; that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Griswold v. GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lockenour v. SidesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Jenkins v. GilliganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Barton v. WoodwardIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clay Thomas v. Scott EschenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Mann v. FairbournUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Hill v. CarlstromOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Dauphine v. HerbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948