Legal Opinion

Straka v. Voyles

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. 4297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution.

Plaintiff in his complaint, in substance, alleged that the “defendant falsely, maliciously, and without probable cause” made -oath to a complaint in which he “falsely, maliciously, and without probable cause” alleged that he believed that the plaintiff “was insane and a fit subject for care and treatment in the State Mental Hospital,” and that the defendant “falsely, maliciously, and! without probable cause” procured plaintiff’s arrest; that the plaintiff was arrested and confined in the Salt Lake county j ail for the space of three days; that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Griswold v. GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lockenour v. SidesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Jenkins v. GilliganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Barton v. WoodwardIdaho Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clay Thomas v. Scott EschenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Mann v. FairbournUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hill v. CarlstromOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dauphine v. HerbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API