Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Masek v. Gehring, Unpublished Decision (9-27-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2002No. Accelerated Case No. 2001-G-2373Unpublished

1Concurrence

{¶ 1} I respectfully concur in judgment only with the majority in this case for the following reasons.

{¶ 2} Appellees claim that on October 19, 2000, the trial court held a pretrial conference. Although the record does not reflect any such conference, the trial court's docket shows that the parties submitted pretrial briefs. In any event, appellees further claim that at this pretrial conference, the trial court conducted an in camera inspection of a variety of documents at issue in discovery and orally determined which documents were not confidential and should be forwarded to appellants.

{¶…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nelson v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API