Legal Opinion

Oberlies v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 18, 2018No. SJC–12472; SJC–12473PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

**824 We are asked to determine whether two initiative petitions satisfy the requirements of art. 48 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution. The first, Initiative Petition 17-07, would limit the number of patients who may be assigned to a registered nurse in Massachusetts health care facilities, and would prohibit facilities from accommodating those limits by reducing certain other health care staff. The second, Initiative Petition 17-08, contains the same provisions as the first petition, with an additional section that would require publicly funded hospitals to make annual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'n v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Paisner v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Mazzone v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TannerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
  2. Craney v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026
  4. Pineau v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API