Legal Opinion
City of Youngstown v. Ortiz
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 2003No. 01 CA 239PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Waite, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} This matter involves the appeal of a judgment issued by the Youngstown Municipal Court ordering appellant, Nelson Ortiz, to be committed for treatment so that he may be restored to competency for a criminal trial. We hold that the trial court properly ordered appellant into treatment so that he could be restored to competency, and we affirm the decision in full.
{¶ 2} Appellant was charged in Youngstown Municipal Court with one count of aggravated menacing in violation of R.C. 2903.21, a first degree misdemeanor. He requested a competency hearing, which was held on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MendezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. UpshawOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. TateOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kushner v. Stubhub, Inc., 07 Ma 15 (6-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008