Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Salmen

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1936No. 7905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Salmen, as absolute assignee of Salmen Home Lumber Company, beneficiary in two policies on the life of Walter F. Pratt, brought this suit to recover $40,000, the double indemnity provided in them for *572death from accident.1 He alleged Pratt’s death, his ownership of the policies, their provision to pay $40,000 in the event of death, and $40,000 more in the event the death was from accident. That the defendant had paid $40,000, but had declined to pay the additional $40,000 for accidental death. He alleged that Pratt came to his death as the result of the accidental…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Pythias Knights' Supreme Lodge v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  2. General American Life Ins. v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API