Legal Opinion

General American Life Ins. v. Floyd

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1936No. 8006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was on a policy providing double indemnity for accidental death. There were two general defenses: (1) That the assured’s death resulted from his violation of law in that (a) he was attempting to kill Gray, who killed him in self-defense; (b) he was engaged in an unlawful trespass; (c) he was unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon, a pistol. (2) That his death was not the result of accidental means, but of his being shot by Gray in self-defense, while as dggressor in a difficulty he had provoked, Floyd was attempting to draw his gun to kill Gray. Appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weathersby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  3. Ætna Life Ins. v. HagemyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  4. Gibson v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  5. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. SalmenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. MurdaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API