General American Life Ins. v. Floyd
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit was on a policy providing double indemnity for accidental death. There were two general defenses: (1) That the assured’s death resulted from his violation of law in that (a) he was attempting to kill Gray, who killed him in self-defense; (b) he was engaged in an unlawful trespass; (c) he was unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon, a pistol. (2) That his death was not the result of accidental means, but of his being shot by Gray in self-defense, while as dggressor in a difficulty he had provoked, Floyd was attempting to draw his gun to kill Gray. Appellant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weathersby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Ætna Life Ins. v. HagemyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Gibson v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. SalmenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. MurdaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938