Stracener v. Bailey
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTRELL, Judge.
The plaintiffs, all owners of lots in the Toddington Heights Subdivision in Mur-freesboro, sued to enjoin the defendant, Richard Bailey, from developing an area referred to on various subdivision plats as a “park” or “future park”. The Circuit Court of Rutherford County issued the injunction, calling the references to the park on the plats a restriction on the use of the property. The defendant has appealed.
Prior to 1960, Mineóla W. Todd and others owned a large tract of undeveloped land in Murfreesboro. Toddington Heights, Inc. was formed to develop the land as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Texas Co. v. AycockTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Land Developers, Inc. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Hillis v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- Greig Massey v. R.W. Graf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- Essary v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Joe Gambrell v. Sonny NivensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.