Legal Opinion

Stracener v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 22, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

The plaintiffs, all owners of lots in the Toddington Heights Subdivision in Mur-freesboro, sued to enjoin the defendant, Richard Bailey, from developing an area referred to on various subdivision plats as a “park” or “future park”. The Circuit Court of Rutherford County issued the injunction, calling the references to the park on the plats a restriction on the use of the property. The defendant has appealed.

Prior to 1960, Mineóla W. Todd and others owned a large tract of undeveloped land in Murfreesboro. Toddington Heights, Inc. was formed to develop the land as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Tallmadge v. . the East River BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Texas Co. v. AycockTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Land Developers, Inc. v. MaxwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hillis v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. Greig Massey v. R.W. Graf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Essary v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  5. Joe Gambrell v. Sonny NivensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API