Legal Opinion

Essary v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 13, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

Defendants, Michael E. Cox, Harold E. Petty, and Cox Oil Company, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s order holding that restrictive language contained in a prior deed constituted a restrictive covenant running with the land which was binding on Defendants as remote grantees. The order further enjoined Defendants from selling oil and gas supplies and products from their property in contravention of the covenant.

At trial the parties stipulated to the following facts:

1. Prior to March 22, 1977, the Plaintiffs, Wayne Essary and Marzell Essary, owned a service station and, on an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Lowe v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Stracener v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  4. Owenby v. BoringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hillis v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. Greig Massey v. R.W. Graf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. General Bancshares, Inc. v. Volunteer Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. Joe Gambrell v. Sonny NivensCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  5. Emma Harris v. Amanda B. AldmonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API