Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCauley v. Talk

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1966No. 7303Published

1Dissent

BERNSTEIN, Vice Chief Justice

(dissenting) .

I must dissent. I think the majority has seriously erred in its statement of the applicable law as well as its analysis of the facts. The proposed definition of undue influence is correct, i. e., “a person unduly influences a testator or testatrix in executing a will when that person through his power over the mind of the testator or testatrix makes the latter’s desires conform to his own, thereby overmastering the volition of testator or testatrix.” We have defined undue influence as a showing that the instrument is not the testator’s free act and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Perkins v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. In Re the Estate of NewhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API