Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Corrigan v. Noble

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 86-111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue at bar is whether we should issue a writ of quo warranto to oust respondent Noble from office and to adjudge relator to be entitled to that office. For the reasons to follow we decline to issue such writ.

It is axiomatic that interpretation of a municipality’s charter is the crucial inquiry in determining the propriety of an official’s removal from office where the charter addresses such contingency. State, ex rel. Gerhardt, v. Krehbiel (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 90 [67 O.O.2d 92].

The North Olmsted Charter states in Section 5, Article III:

“Duties and Powers of the Mayor.
“(a) * * *
“Except…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cain v. KayOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Gerhardt v. KrehbielOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State, Ex Rel. Joecken v. Lynch.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Clark v. DuffyOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. State ex rel. Daniels v. HinksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Madden v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API