Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 12, 2003No. 95C-11416; A107806PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision affirming the post-conviction court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Cunningham v. Thompson, 186 Or App 221, 62 P3d 823 (2003). Specifically, he seeks reconsideration of his tenth assignment of error, pertaining to his criminal trial counsel’s failure to impeach the testimony, in the penalty phase of petitioner’s criminal trial, of a psychologist, Dr. Cochran. 1 We allow the petition, modify our opinion, and adhere to it as modified.

For convenience, we set out in full our discussion, in our opinion, of petitioner’s tenth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Stevens v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Horn v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Harris v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Moyer v. Columbia State BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API