Legal Opinion

Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital & Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 2007No. 040707139; A130070PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiffs, who are individuals and putative class representatives employed by defendants, appeal from the trial court’s judgment of dismissal for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 21 A. The issue before us is whether plaintiffs can bring an action against defendants based on defendants’ failure to provide statutorily required meal and rest breaks. Defendants argued, and the trial court agreed, that violation of the statutes on which plaintiffs based their complaint might expose defendants to administrative sanctions, but such violations do not confer on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fearing v. BucherOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cunningham v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ross v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
  2. Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital & Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rogers v. RGIS, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Athena v. Pelican Brewing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Rogers v. RGIS, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API