Armstrong v. Presslor
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, C. J.
The appellant was a defendant in an action on notes and to foreclose a mortgage. She answered in one pleading paragraph containing a great number of rhetorical paragraphs. The appellee filed a motion to strike out the answer -.on the ground that it did not conform to the code or the rules of this Supreme Court of Indiana. The court sustained the motion to strike out the:answer. Later,- on motion of appellant, a.change of venue-was granted and the matter was sent to the Fountain Circuit Court. In that court, the plaintiff secured a rule to answer against thé defendant, and the defendant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Woodbury Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Butler v. Wolf Sussman, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Western MacHine Works v. Edwards MacHine & Tool Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
- Parscouta v. State ex rel. BakajsaIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Wohadlo v. FaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by11 opinions
- New York Central R. Co. v. CAVINDER, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Christapher Batchelor v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- Jolly v. MODISETTIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Hurd v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Gatewood v. Hamilton Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.