Legal Opinion

Wohadlo v. Fary

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1943No. 27,836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, C. J.

The trial court upon motion struck out appellants’ amended complaint in two paragraphs and entered judgment that they take nothing and pay the costs. The first paragraph seeks to review and vacate for errors of law a judgment of partition. It was not filed within one year from the date of the judgment. The second paragraph is for an injunction against the enforcement of the judgment and is attempted to be brought under the rule in Livengood v. M unns (1940), 108 Ind. App. 27, 32, 27 N. E. (2d) 92, 94, which sustains the power of a court of equity “to enjoin the enforcement of unconscionable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Calumet Teaming & Trucking Co. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lambert v. Smith, State Fire MarshalIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Livengood v. MunnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. PresslorIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Armstrong v. PresslorIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Wohadlo v. FarryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API