Legal Opinion

Caleb Whitfield v. Lt. Hartford, et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 27, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00779Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Caleb Whitfield, Case No. 3:25-cv-779 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Lt. Hartford, et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Lt. Hartford and Correctional Officer Fahle moved to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Caleb Whitfield’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 6). Whitfield opposed Defendants’ motion, (Doc. No. 8), and Defendants filed a brief in reply. (Doc. No. 9). Whitfield then filed a sur-reply brief, (Doc. No. 10), which Defendants moved to strike. (Doc. No.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ronald Combs, Jason Robb, and George Skatzes v. Reginald Wilkinson, Director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API